Mesothelioma

Safe Harbor This press release includes statements that may constitute "forward- looking" statements, usually containing the words "believe," "estimate," "project," "expect" or similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.

Factors that would cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, uncertainties involved in transitioning from concept to product, uncertainties involving the ability of the company to finance research and development activities, potential challenges to or violations of patents, uncertainties regarding the outcome of clinical trials, the company's ability to secure necessary approvals from regulatory agencies, dependence upon third-party vendors, and other risks discussed in the company's periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

By making these forward-looking statements, the company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this release.

Media Contact: Investor Contact: David Schull or Wendy Lau Andreas Marathovouniotis Noonan Russo Noonan Russo 212-845-4271 212-845-4253 david.schull@euror...

The plaintiff's attorney argued that his client had lost 40 pounds and may not survive to attend the trial if it is postponed.

One year to prepare Maddux denied the request for a continuance and told the defense lawyer to subpoena the employer, ordering it to bring the records to the trial or be held in contempt.

His denial is illustrative of how Maddux keeps the asbestos cases on track.

His goal is to give both sides about a year to prepare for trial, though most cases are settled before they reach that stage.

It is an ambitious schedule, considering some complaints run 300 pages and have more than 50 defendants.

"What you try to do is give a person a day in court while they are still with us," Maddux said in an interview after the motion call.

He follows case-management guidelines that Cook County put in place in 1990s.

The guidelines were aimed at preventing the court from being overwhelmed with thousands of claims from people who had been exposed to asbestos, but who had not contracted cancer or other life-threatening illnesses.

These so-called unimpaired claims-described by defense lawyers as "junk" cases-have delayed justice in numerous other jurisdictions and created a litigation mess rife with unscrupulous lawyers and doctors.

But Cook County's system has created some friction.

Lawyers on both sides complain that t...